Elk Grove School Board Candidate Opposes Bond Measure; State Treasurer Issues Warning

One candidate for the Elk Grove Unified School District Board of Trustees has come out in opposition to the district's proposed sch...


One candidate for the Elk Grove Unified School District Board of Trustees has come out in opposition to the district's proposed school bond measure.

Nikita Kostyuk, who is running against incumbent Carmine Forcina for the Area 7 seat, announced today that he opposes the EGUSD's Measure M. That measure if passed, would permit the district to issue $476 in bonds for school renovations. 

Arguing against the bond, Kostyuk asserts that while he supports facility maintenance, the measure has several structural flaws.

“Twenty-four schools constructed in the last 15 years made the list to receive money from Measure M,” he said. “Why aren’t we prioritizing aging schools that need this money the most?” 

At their August 1 meeting, the EGUSD Board of Trustees voted unanimously to place the bond measure on the ballot. The measure needs 55-percent approval to pass.

According to Richard Michael of the school bond watchdog group BigBadBonds.org, Elk Grove's measure is one of 184 local measures in 46 counties in California that will appear on the November ballot. In the November 2014 election, there were 114 measures on ballots statewide.

"The total face value of the bonds is $25,313,826,000," Michael said. "The cost to homeowners and business owners that actually pay the bill will be over $50 billion." 

Michael also noted the total could have been higher were it not for 12 school boards who rejected about $2 billion more bonds. Additionally, the State of California has placed a statewide measure, Proposition 51, on the ballot that seeks $9 billion in school bonds.  

In light of the spate of local bond measures, California State Treasurer John Chiang recently took steps to stop Wall Street bond underwriters from helping local school district fund pro-bond political campaigns. Under this scenario, the Wall Street firms who fund the campaigns for school districts are then awarded lucrative underwriting contracts. 

“There are unscrupulous Wall Street firms offering to fund local bond campaigns in exchange for lucrative contracts,” Chiang said. “Not only are these pay-to-play arrangements unlawful, they rip-off taxpayers and endanger the integrity of school bonds, which are vital tools for building classrooms and meeting the educational needs of our communities.”








Related

Government & Politics 454583613576408377

Follow Us

Popular

Archives

Corrections




item