Commentary - Promises made, but not kept
https://www.elkgrovenews.net/2020/01/promises-made-but-not-kept.html
By Dan Walters |
CalMatters Commentary
Last month, McClatchy Newspapers and the ProPublica news organization published an investigative
article delving into how billions of dollars meant to
reduce repeat criminal activity by improving local jails and probation services
were siphoned off for other purposes.
“Since 2011, California has sent more than $8
billion to counties to cover the costs of the massive prison overhaul approved
that year, known as ‘realignment,’ which diverted thousands of inmates from
prisons to local jails,” the article, published in the Sacramento Bee and
other McClatchy newspapers, revealed.
The money was meant to pay for jailing the diverted
felons and for programs to help them avoid lives of crime. However, as the
article points out, county officials instead shifted much of the money into
ordinary law enforcement activities, especially sheriff’s offices.
Why? Law enforcement costs were outstripping local
revenues largely for the unspoken reason that the California Public Employees’
Retirement System (CalPERS) was pressuring local governments to contribute more
money to offset the system’s investment losses during the Great Recession, and
to pay for pension benefit increases. Pension contributions for law enforcement
officers are especially high, about 50 cents for every dollar of salary,
because they receive the most generous benefits.
Regardless of the underlying reasons for the financial
moves reported by McClatchy and the nonprofit ProPublica,
they are another example of a long-standing, corrosive trend in California
government.
Governors and legislators routinely make what they
describe as transformative policy decrees and then either neglect to follow
through or fail to monitor how the money meant to implement the policy is being
spent.
What’s happened with realignment money is eerily similar
to what happened to another sweeping policy also championed by former Gov.
Jerry Brown: an overhaul of school finance called the Local Control Funding
Formula.
It removed restrictions on some state school aid and
gave school districts with large numbers of underperforming poor and
English-learner students extra funds to close a stubborn “achievement gap.”
As with realignment, Brown and other state officials
failed — refused, actually — to monitor how the extra school money was being
spent. However, outside studies have shown that much of it has been diverted to
general purposes, including demands on school districts to pump more funds into
CalPERS and the California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS) to save
them from insolvency.
A few days after the McClatchy-ProPublica article
appeared, CalMatters published another
article about the enact-and-forget syndrome, this one
involving a crisis in mental health treatment that contributes mightily to the
state’s horrendous homelessness problem.
“In 1967, a law passed that transformed the treatment of
people with mental illness in California,” the article noted. Much like
realignment decades later, it was meant to depopulate the state’s mental
hospitals, curb involuntary commitments and divert the mentally ill into local
treatment programs.
However, the promises of the 1967 Lanterman-Petris-Short act to create a network
of easily accessible local mental health services were never kept. The money
that had been saved from closing mental hospitals was swallowed up in state
budgets approved by then-Gov. Ronald Reagan and his successors from both
parties.
Thus, the mentally ill were left wandering the streets,
often winding up in local jails and state prisons when they committed crimes
and contributing to the penal crisis that realignment was supposed to address a
half-century later.
We should keep the 1967 mental health law, the Local
Control Funding Formula and realignment in mind the next time the state’s
politicians tell us they are enacting a transformative solution to a pressing
problem.
CalMatters is a public-interest
journalism venture committed to explaining how California's state Capitol works
and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to
calmatters.org/commentary.
Post a Comment