California Legislator Lashes Out At Health Care Inequities - 'A Tapeworm On Our Salaries and Our Industries'
By Michael Monasky | October 24, 2017 | Despite a legislature in adjournment, a leading California Assembly Democrat passionate...
https://www.elkgrovenews.net/2017/10/california-legislator-lashes-out-at.html
By Michael Monasky | October 24, 2017 |
Despite a legislature in adjournment, a leading California
Assembly Democrat passionately criticized the health care system in a special
informational hearing in Sacramento on Monday, October 23, 2017.
The select
committee convened in response to the tabling of single payer health care bill,
SB 562, by Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon last July. Joaquin Arambula
represents Assembly District 31 in the middle of the great Central Valley of
California near Fresno, and co-chairs the select body. Arambula is an emergency
room physician and spoke from his own experience.
Arambula
told the crowded Capitol hearing room that the system is a “medical apartheid
for those who can, and those who cannot, afford health care resources.” He said
that he's seen lives shortened for what he blamed as “a broken immigration
system,” because undocumented persons are not permitted to participate in
subsidized insurance plans of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (aka, ObamaCare.) Near tears, he revealed the tragic story of a 20-year old diabetic woman he treated in the emergency department who could not afford
medicine, only to return at age 28 with kidney failure.
Arambula
said that current economic analysis blames wage stagnation, but he attributed
that condition to income inequality. His diagnosis: the health care system is
“a tapeworm on our salaries and our industries.” He asked the panel of experts
from three think tanks how to control health care costs.
UC Berkeley Labor Center director Ken Jacobs said that the fee-for-service model used today
promotes more money to be made per unit of treatment delivered; Jacobs said
that we should desire “rewards for positive outcomes, not units of treatment.”
Deborah
Kelch, director of the insurance industry-funded Insure The Uninsured
Project, said that costs had three components: defining benefits; defining
who's covered; and how providers are paid. Kelch defined managed care, as a
replacement for fee-for-service, in her presentation to the lawmakers as “...a
coverage model with incentives and/or restrictions to use a defined network of
affiliated or contracted providers and at least some management of costs and
utilization.” She further noted that “Managed care in California is always
evolving in terms of network model, provider payment methods, and degree of
emphasis on managing costs and coordinating care.” Kelch equivocated whether
management of care meant management of costs, noting that controlling one did
not necessarily lead to affecting the other.
Edwin Park
is an attorney and Vice President for Health Policy at the Center for Budget
and Policy Priorities. Funded mostly by institutional and private foundations,
CBPP analyzes the lower half of the US economic population. Park's comments to
the chair about costs pertained to Baby Boomers; in the past, they mostly
contributed to, but now they draw down from, health care funds. When Arambula
inquired about potential federal cuts to health care, Park said that the
“magnitude of the cuts are so large” that 14-22 million persons would lose
coverage in the US. California stands to lose $800 million in cost sharing
reduction funding alone due to Trump's recent executive order.
An
emergency room doctor, Arambula noted that patient visits increased three-fold
in a ten year period of his practice, which he attributed to lack of access to
preventive medical resources. Born in Delano, the birthplace of the United Farm
Workers Union of Cesar Chavez and the great Table Grape Strike, he practiced
medicine in nearby Selma, California, the Raisin Capital of the World. The
physician-legislator lamented the lack of safety nets for gaps in health care
coverage, which lead to great yet unknown costs of lost productivity in the
workplace, absenteeism, illness, unmet household needs, medical debt, and
bankruptcies. The expert panel had no numbers for these costs.
Post a Comment