CA’s tough gun laws aren’t tough enough, it turns out - and guess who’s stepping in
https://www.elkgrovenews.net/2019/10/cas-tough-gun-laws-arent-tough-enough.html
By Barbara Harvey,
CalMatters |
On paper,
William Carl Adkins is a perfect candidate for prosecution under California’s
tough gun control laws. At 34, he has a rap sheet that dates to 2007 and
includes possession of drugs with intent to sell, vehicle theft, burglary,
drugs again, and, in 2014, being a felon in possession of a firearm. That was
the first gun arrest.
This
time, police in the Fresno County town of Selma suspected Adkins was involved
in an attempted homicide, and contacted the U.S. Marshals Service for
assistance in his apprehension. On Feb. 22, local cops and federal agents
spotted him, tailed him for a few blocks and converged.
“I have a
gun on me,” Adkins told officers, according to court records. A .40 caliber
Glock was tucked into his waistband. Its serial number matched one stolen in a
burglary in Fresno in 2018.
Such a case typically would go straight to the Fresno County
District Attorney for handling in the state’s criminal justice system. But with
local authorities’ consent, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of
California, which runs from Bakersfield to the Oregon border and includes 8
million residents, is prosecuting Adkins federally.
California
has some of the nation’s strongest gun control laws,
with 15 more signed into law Friday
by Gov. Gavin Newsom. Gun control advocates here are quick to criticize the
Trump administration and the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate for failing to
pass strong gun safety laws. At his bill signing, Newsom called out U.S. Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky again for failing to bring gun
legislation to a vote, calling him “cowardly in the face of this moment” and
saying he “lacks resolve, character and leadership on this issue” with
“people’s lives … hanging in the balance.”
But as
happened in Selma, local police in California have increasingly been turning to
federal authorities for help prosecuting gun crimes. The reason? Adkins and people
like him face far more time behind federal bars than they would if they were
prosecuted under state law.
The
program under which his case is being handled, Project Safe Neighborhoods, got
its start in 2001 under President George W. Bush. It fell out of favor during
the Obama administration, but the Justice Department under then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions reinstated it.
The idea
is to seek out suspects considered to be especially dangerous and maximize
their prison time by prosecuting them through the federal system. Under
California law, felons caught in possession of a firearm could face up to three
years in prison. That sentence could be reduced by half for good behavior. Some
felons caught with guns end up doing time in county jails.
Under
federal law, however, they face 10 years in prison, and must serve at least 85%
of that sentence. Since 2018, 175 individuals have been indicted on federal
charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm in the Eastern District,
and 161 have been sentenced to prison.
“One of
the top priorities given to the United States attorneys at the outset of this
administration by Attorney General Sessions was to reduce violent crime because
it had spiked up to previous years nationally,” U.S. Attorney McGregor Scott of
Sacramento said. “We’ve been going gangbusters ever since.”
In
September, federal grand juries indicted:
- A 28-year-old
Sacramento ex-felon who was accused of selling a gun after he left a
parole office. Authorities found an AR-15 assault rifle that had no serial
number.
- A 32-year-old
Sacramento ex-felon on a variety of charges including shooting at a
federal agent and possessing multiple firearms, including two machine
guns. He faces life in prison if convicted.
- A 27-year old
Bakersfield ex-felon on charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm,
a Glock that had been converted into a fully automatic machine gun. He
faces 10 years in a federal penitentiary.
- A 58-year-old
ex-felon who had a semi-automatic weapon, after previously having been
convicted of being a felon in possession of a gun.
“We’re
not taking all of them, not by any stretch of the imagination,” Scott said. “We
focus on people with lengthy criminal records, prior convictions for crimes of
violence, and focus on those, because those are the problems in these
communities.”
In 2016 and
again in 2018, then-Assemblywoman Catharine Baker of Dublin, a Republican,
introduced legislation to increase the sentence
under California law for being a felon in possession of a firearm to a maximum
of six years.
Baker,
who was unseated in the 2018 Democratic wave, was the
rare Republican who was disliked by the National Rifle Association and highly
thought of by gun control advocates. She carried bills on behalf of the Brady
Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.
“Felons
who illegally possess firearms are exactly the folks we ought to get behind
bars,” Baker said. “They are thumbing their nose at society.”
Her bills
never got far.
The ACLU
and public defenders opposed them, citing the need to keep prison populations
from increasing.
In a
letter opposing Baker’s 2018 bill, the county public defenders argued that
“non-violent weapons laws are disproportionately enforced against minorities,
so any enhanced sentence for this violation will likely have a disparate impact
on nonwhite community members.”
Her
legislation stalled in its first committee, the Assembly Public Safety
Committee. Its chair, Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, a Los Angeles Democrat,
opposes almost any bill that would add to prison time.
Baker
believes she could have won passage if her bills made it to the Assembly floor.
Republicans and many Democrats support such measures.
“I have
no doubt I would have gotten the votes,” Baker said. “Most moderate Democrats
would have found it appealing.”
Democratic
Assemblyman Mike Gipson of Compton said there is “debate” over whether felons
who have served their debts to society should have their gun rights restored,
though he hasn’t taken a side on that debate. Among the legislation Newsom
signed Friday was a Gipson bill restricting the
sale of gun parts to ex-felons or people with a history of mental illness.
Newsom
said he was unsure whether or not state sentences for felons who possess
firearms are sufficient: “My biggest issue is getting these guns out of the
hands of felons. … If the law itself is inadequate as it relates to sentencing
guidelines, honestly I don’t have a good assessment of that.”
Local
authorities still handle the vast majority of cases involving felons in
possession of guns. But they do turn to Uncle Sam for a select few, especially
in Fresno County, where representatives from local law enforcement and the U.S.
Attorney’s office meet to discuss potential cases roughly once a week.
“The
purpose of that discussion is to determine if we’d get more bang for our buck
if we charge this person federally,” said Fresno County Undersheriff Steve
Wilkins.
Wilkins
said the program has benefits beyond longer sentences. For instance, local gang
members can be isolated from each other by being sent to serve their time in a
federal facilities anywhere in the country.
“It might
make it harder for them to communicate with their gang or call the shots,”
Wilkins said.
Fresno
County has the highest number of federal indictments on the charge in the
Eastern District, and 62 have been sentenced to prison. Solano County west of Sacramento
is second with 24.
Sacramento
County District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert said the tactic is, in a sense,
more in line with California’s philosophy than California’s own, lighter
penalties for felons caught with firearms: “If we’re going to regulate the use
of guns, why wouldn’t we regulate guns to the best of our ability? It’s almost
like an oxymoron,” she said.
“We are
talking about very dangerous people,” Schubert said, noting that a dozen people
in her county have been sentenced on federal law since 2018. “We want to make
sure we seek the best tools to keep the community safe. ”
CalMatters.org is a nonprofit,
nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics. Elk Grove News is a media partner of CalMatters.
Post a Comment