Mum's the word on reported
grand jury probe of Hume

by Thom Nadeau of Notable Trials A spokesperson for the Sacramento County Grand Jury would neither confirm nor deny whether the investigat...

by Thom Nadeau
of Notable Trials

A spokesperson for the Sacramento County Grand Jury would neither confirm nor deny whether the investigative body is looking into a rumored probe of Elk Grove City Council member Patrick Hume.

Grand Jury Coordinator Becky Castaneda responded Monday to a query left Friday asking whether it was true, or not true that Hume had drawn the attention of the citizen investigative panel.

"The policy is to make no statements," Castaneda said, pleasantly enough.

However, Hume testified in court and under oath that he had been contacted by the Elk Grove city attorney saying he was the subject of a grand jury query.

The Fair Political Practices Commission recently confirmed that it was looking into allegations concerning Hume.

Elk Grove News can definitely confirm that it can not confirm that the grand jury wouldn’t confirm the previously unconfirmed verbal report – to borrow a dodge from seasoned public servants.

Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cecil heard three hours of testimony Friday regarding Hume’s relationship with Conley, his former campaign manager.

The two have been embroiled in a rather torrid tiff over their split-up apparently brought on by his new alliance with another acquaintance of the female persuasion, one Lisa Lent.

Hume obtained a court stay-away order against Conley – one of those “don’t talk to me because I don’t want to talk to you” court directives – which seemed to have been honored more in the breach than in the observance, since Conley produced in court (and Hume confirmed) a hefty volume containing hundreds of pages of transcribed phone messages, text messages and emails that the two had exchanged.

Both admitted attending political events together when they were legally required to avoid each other as best they could.

A stay-away order is a legal admonition that allows people who have professional roles that make a restraining order too constricting for them to obey – e.g., the two both hold public office and/or work in politics and may be required to be at the same events at the same time..

The stay-away order lets them appear at the same event, with the caveat that they not pester each other while they are there.

Last week, Hume asked the court to extend and toughen the stay-away order. Judge Cecil wondered, Why? – since the two star-crossed ex-friends seemed to keep colliding with each other, anyway.

Cecil said he will have a formal ruling and solution ready by Oct. 8.

Post a Comment Default Comments

Follow Us

Popular

Archives

Elk Grove News Minute Podcast

Elk Grove News Podcast




item